Category Archives: Rant

Why do Tech Pundits want an Apple Television?

Apple televisionWhat is this fascination with Tech Pundits over an Apple Television? Why do they want one so much?

More importantly, what could Apple bring to the Television market that it hasn’t already brought to the Television Set-top box market?

Do these tech pundits really think that normal consumers, not the pundits themselves, but normal average Joe’s, are going to run out and purchase a $2,000 46″ Apple Television just because it has the guts of an AppleTV built-in?

Some pundits think that this new television is going to cost $599. Really? $599 for a full size television that sits in a persons family room?

OK, the average lifespan of a good LCD Television is about 10 years. (60,000-100,000 hours) Apple loves to release new versions of it’s products every year. Is Apple expecting consumers to purchase new televisions every year? More importantly, are these pundits thinking this?

It’s way more likely that the average consumer would upgrade their AppleTV Set-top box when Apple updates it. It’s just $99 and gives them all the power a $2,000 or even $599 full blown television would.

So why would Apple attempt to get into the television business when it is doing so well in the cell phone/tablet/personal media player/computer/music sales business?

Please, can anyone offer a reasonable explanation why Apple would benefit from getting into the television business?


Hollywood, it’s time to get with the times!

Feature smart phoneAm I the only one watching scripted television shows that show actors answering their iPhones or Android phones with the home screens showing? Or with the iPhone screen glowing in the actor’s ear? Not to mention the phone “beeping” when they answer it or hang up?

Smart phones don’t “beep” when you answer them! I suppose you could modify the sounds a jailbroken iPhone makes when answering the phone to beep, but who would want to?

It’s like watching those older action shows where the car’s tires are squealing on “wet” pavement or worse sandy, gravel or dirt roads!

Why are these mistakes still being made and why do the bug the crap out of me?!


NBC Nightly News reports asteroid to make close pass!

Wpid US astronomer Phil Plait has said we have nothing to fear from 2012 DA14 for nowOh My!

So I’m watching NBC’s Nightly News via a podcast last night when Brian Williams starts telling us about an upcoming asteroid near miss. He very briefly mentions “We’ll be hearing a lot about this in the next 11 months…”.

To be fair, the asteroid will pass pretty close. 16,800 miles at it’s closest pass and that is an estimate based on what little data astronomers have acquired since Feb. 23 when it was discovered. Some info on 2012 DA14 can be found here.

The end of the sound byte stats: “The experts all say there is nothing wrong with making sure your affairs are in order.” Wow! Talk about news sensationalism! What a load of crap. (Sorry about the stupid ad pre-roll. It’s MSNBC’s fault.)

Here is a link to the video. (Sorry couldn’t embed it, thanks WordPress.com!)

I have learned to take what the talking heads on TV say with a huge grain of salt. This because when they discuss topics I actually do know something about, they typically get the facts completely wrong or way over hyped. Case in point, Google’s new privacy policy.

I usually head over to Phil Plait’s website, the creator of Bad Astronomy, to see what a true expert has to say. It’s clear that everyone who is any one in Astronomy is saying that it will miss us next year.

Even if it did hit us, from what Wikipedia says, it would produce an event the size of Tunguska impact. If that happened over a populated city, there would be huge devastation. However, if it hit unpopulated land or water, the event might go unnoticed.

So, to offset MSNBC’s scary graph behind Brian, I’ll copy this image stolen from Phil’s website:

Impact no


News about MLB.com At Bat ’12

Quick look at todays free amazon app mlbcom at bat mzbo 0

UPDATE 2/27/12: I just found some new info about MLB.com At Bat ’12 that you should check out. It’s in this new blog post: Update to MLB.com At Bat ’12 info.

UPDATE 2/28/12: Macworld just put up a post about the app: MLB.com At Bat warms up for 2012 season.

UPDATE 2/29/12: The MLB.com At Bat ’12 app is finally out! Take a look!

I was just informed by a friend that MLB in their infinite wisdom has drastically changed the MLB.com At Bat app for 2012. After doing a little digging, I found an article that pretty much says it all.

This year, we’ve just confirmed that MLB At Bat 12 will be free  with your subscription, which remains at $119.99 for existing subscribers. New subscriptions will be priced at $124.99. This enables you to receive 150 Spring Training games and all 2430 regular season games (some games are subject to blackout), with no added cost for either the iPhone or iPad apps.

Every article I found about this change made it sound wonderful! This would be true if you were writing to all the folks that paid the $125 subscription last season.

First off, you do not get 2,430 games! There is no way that anyone will be able to stream every game! There are games that start at similar times, the AppleTV and iOS devices can only play one stream at a time. Sure, your computer can do more than one, but how many people are going to sit in front of their “computer” and watch several games at a time. I guess, if that computer were hooked up to an HDTV, they might, but that’s about it.

Secondly, last season, people were able to pay $15 for the Game Day Audio streams. Being forced to pay almost 10x that for the ability to listen to Game Day Audio again is ludicrous!
I’m having a hard time understanding why all the reviews I have read so far about this news is positive! I would much rather pay $30 or even $50 for MLB.com At Bat ’12!

In this household. We paid the $15 for MLB.com At Bat ’11 and $15 for the Game Day Audio. We were fine with that. In fact, I paid $30 for the apps because I bought both the iPhone and iPad versions!

To be fair, it’s not all that clear if the Game Day Audio can be purchased separately and used with the app, or the only subscription that will work with the app is the full $125 one.

The $125 subscription really caters best to people who root for a team that doesn’t play in the city they live in. My wife who is a huge Indians fan living in St. Louis would benefit the most from a $125 subscription, but as a Cardinals fan, there is no big advantage.

Ah well, time to look for a new app to track baseball!


Surprise, Pandora Sends User Data to Advertisers!

Pandora logo

Ars Technica has an article posted about how Pandora.com is sending personal user data to advertisers. Oh no, say it ain’t so!

The comments on the site are mostly of outrage that Pandora would do such a thing. I have to say that it never ceases to amaze me as to how stupid some people can really be.

Looking over the privacy policy at Pandora.com, they don’t make it clear exactly what they collect on mobile devices, just “transactional” data, whatever that means. The privacy policy does state that it will grab unique identifiers from mobile devices, IP addresses from desktop computers, etc…

However, when you signup for the service you are presented with a signup form that is pretty straight forward:

Pandora reg tm

The “why?” links take you to FAQ pages clearly telling you that Pandora users advertisers to help pay for the service they provide. This info is also available when you look at your account settings after signing up.

Now, when I signed up for the service, I wasn’t required to enter the Birth Year, Zip Code or Gender info so my account has blanks in those fields. You are now required to enter data into those fields. However, no one is forcing you to enter accurate data. The Birth Year is important to make sure you are not younger than 13, the rest is clearly for advertising reasons.

Still, it’s not like Pandora is trying to hide the fact that they send this data to advertisers, they clearly state it if the user dares to click the “why?” link.

You know, is so funny that privacy advocates get all up in arms over these little cases. There are so many other more egregious privacy issues to go after, like Facebook…


Parents: Be Aware!!

app_store_icon.png

Its really sad when Apple, a company that I feel is pretty trustworthy, allows developers to sell applications like the ones I am about to talk about for amounts that are so out of the ballpark that one can only assume that they are trying to take advantage of the single click purchase system.

Case in point: A company called [Mini Fun World](http://www.minifunworld.com/). According to their website, you can get all their applications for $0.99.

mfw-ss_tm.png
(Click above thumbnail for full size image)

So then you click on the App Store image on their website to take you to the App Store so that you can purchase the application only to find:

itmfw-ss_fs.png

This is no typo as one might imagine. A little research at AppShopper.com and you can see that the developer had actually set the price to $449.99 for nearly a month before bringing the price “down” to $399.99.

asmfw-ss_tm.png
(Click above thumbnail for full size image)

This is no exception for Mini Fun World either. Apparently, Mini Fun World feels that all of their applications are worth well over $100 each.

itmfwapps-ss_tm.png
(Click above thumbnail for full size image)

There was another developer that was increasing his apps price over time as an experiment. After the app got to about the same price as Shapes N Colors here, they pulled the app and banned the developer. Mind you, that developer dissed the App Store at a conference for independent developers recently. Still, you have to wonder what Apple is thinking when they see apps priced like Mini Fun World’s apps.

So parents, make darn sure you pay attention to what your children want for their iPod touch and iPads. Don’t just look at the developers website and say OK. Check the App Store to make sure. Also, create iTunes accounts that are not tied to a credit card for your kids. You can control the account and send it an “allowance” to make sure your kids don’t accidentally purchase a program that is advertised as $0.99 but is actually $399.99!


Apple: Please, Make Up Your Mind About The Mini Player Keyboard Shortcut In iTunes!

itunes-icon.png

Really, what is the deal with you guys. Every time you update iTunes, the Maximize button/Keyboard Shortcut (Ctrl-Command-Z) works differently. At first, tapping Ctrl-Command-Z would toggle the user between the normal view and the Mini Player:
itunes-miniplayer.png

Then updates started showing up that when the keyboard shortcut is used would cause iTunes to “Maximize” it’s window to the full screen. Then with iTunes 9.0-9.0.2, the shortcut was toggling between normal and Mini Player again.

Now with iTunes 9.0.3, the Ctrl-Command-Z maximizes the iTunes window again. I now see that there is a “new” shortcut: Shift-Command-M. That toggles between the Mini Player and the normal iTunes window.

Apple, please, make up your mind and stick with it. You guys are so much better than Microsoft and Windows, yet with iTunes, I feel that you decided to give the project to a bunch of Windows developers you recently hired.

So is it safe to assume that “Shift-Command-M” is the toggle now and forever? Please?


Will Apple Fanboy's Ever Relax?

upload_73695.jpg

No sooner than the iPad news is released than rumors of yet another “real” Mac Tablet computer are floating around again!

Don’t get me wrong here, I consider myself to be a pretty faithful Apple Fanboy. I have quite a few iPods (3G, 4G, 5G and an iPod touch), two iPhones (myself and my wife), and two Macs (MacBook and Mac Pro). I lust for the new Unibody MacBook’s, I would love to have that new trackpad. I would also love to get the new iPad when it comes out and I am pretty much planning on getting the next-gen iPhone when it comes out.

However, I think all this speculation and rumor business is totally over the top and ridiculous. For probably a year, there has been nothing but rumor, speculation, and lust over a nonexistent Mac Tablet that finally turned out to be the iPad. We still haven’t heard the end of that damn thing. Why does the 3G cost so much more than the hardware ($500 vrs. $630), will it be able to make phone calls?, will it be able to record movies?, etc… Not to mention all the humor that has arisen from the whole feminine product name: iPad.

Will Apple come out with a real Tablet computer? Who the F**K cares! Oh My God people? You all are worse than stalkers! Unbelievable! You monitor web log files for browser types that could mean that a new device from Apple is coming. You even figure out that there were 50 iPad devices in Apple with various types of applications on them before the announcement.

Do you people have lives? I used to work for a company that makes MMORPG’s. In one of the games, the GM’s created a vine that started growing outside the main cities gates. Once someone noticed it (about 10 minutes after it was put into the game), players started watching the vine to see what would happen next to it. They organized watch schedules so that there was at least a couple of people watching that vine ever minute of every day. We’re not talking a graphical MMORPG either here. We are talking text based, so they had to “Look” at the room and the vine repetitively over and over again. That went on for over a month!

With Apple, it seems that I am seeing that behavior all over again. When the store closes for 5 seconds, blogs post about the closure as if something wonderful is going to happen. If a store that sells Apple products make a mistake, the blogs post an image of the mistake within seconds, if Steve Jobs blinks out of pattern, he’s either going to announce something or he’s dying! Just look at the over analysis of the invitation to the iPad announcement. Every paint splotch was analyzed trying to make heads or tails of what the announcement was going to have in it. Because they all knew that one of the announcements was going to be an Apple Tablet. (Which it wasn’t)

TUAW, even scored themselves over the predictions they made and way over scored themselves. They pretty much had all the predictions wrong, yet the worst they did was 5 out of 12 or something like that.

My God people, get over it. Get on with your lives. As William Shatner once said: “Get a life!”

If Apple comes out with new hardware, you will hear about it when Apple announces/leaks it, not a moment sooner. You can speculate all you want, but that is not going to make Apple/Jobs create a device that you folks have been having wet dreams about for over a year.

Just be happy that your favoriate computer company is making money and doing pretty darn well for itself. They are not likely to die anytime soon, and a real Tablet will not put them over the edge and become the new Dell/HP.

Sheesh!


Boy Will I Be Glad When The 27th Comes And Goes…

rumor.gif

OMG!!! I can’t get over all the “speculation” that is going on with the Mac Blogosphere these days over the announcement that Apple is going to make on the 27th. There have been times when the anticipation of an announcement was pretty high and blogs were buzzing, but nothing at all like now.

Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see Apple come out with a tablet device. However, I’m not about to wet myself with anticipation. Maybe that’s because I’m unemployed and wouldn’t be able to afford the device. I really just think that I am sick to death of reading post after post about what Apple is going to announce on the 27th.

I’m going to be laughing my ass off when Steve comes out and announces new iMac’s and maybe some new iPods and that’s it.

However, I suspect that it will be more than that. There will probably be an announcement of an iPhone OS 4 (it’s due), it won’t be ready for a few months after the announcement though since developers haven’t seen anything yet.

I suspect that there will also be an announcement of a tablet device of some kind. Since if there is a new iPhone OS, it would make sense to keep it secret if it works with a tablet device.

Still, the blog post that cracked me up the most was the deep analysis of the image that came with the invitation to the announcement. Almost each paint spatter was analyzed to justify the rumor of a tablet device.

Its great that Mac enthusiasts get excited about upcoming products and announcements. You really don’t see that with Windows products. Still, I’m almost tempted to unsubscribe to the blogs I read until after the 27th just to get some relief from all the tittering.


Apple Knowingly Approves An App That Captures Your Contact Information!

dragondictation.png

Holy Crap! Apple is loosing it’s collective mind!

OK, a few months back, there was a big uproar over several game applications being removed from the AppStore because they used a game engine that acquired “your” phone number for identification purposes. Mind you, thats what the UDID (Unique Device IDentifier) number is that is assigned to each and every iPhone/iPod touch made. So, Apple removed the applications from the AppStore until the engine developer fixed the problem.

Now, I learn that Apple has “knowingly” approved Dragon Dictation when it captures your contact information directly off your iPhone/iPod touch! I say knowingly because it’s right in the applications description:

PRIVACY:

In order to improve recognition accuracy, Dragon Dictation will only upload names from your address book… no emails, addresses, phone numbers, or other personal information are uploaded. This information is not used for any purpose other than improving the usability of the application. All data is stored in secure data centers according to stringent privacy and security standards. For more information, please view our corporate privacy policy at http://www.nuance.com/company/privacy/

So, why has Apple allowed Dragon Dictation to be approved to the AppStore when other applications were pulled for similar reasons? Was it because they were “up front” about the acquisition?

I have AppAdvice.com to thank for spilling the beans for me. There were probably other blogs that reported this information, but I read it first there.

Their claim is that having that information makes it easier for Dragon Dictation to dictate names you might speak when using their software.

Now, to be fair, Nuance Communications did post that they were doing this in the application description and I didn’t read that part of the description when I downloaded and used the software. However, I feel very violated by this and am very surprised that, in this day and age, the “option” to disable the sending of this information wasn’t put into the software in the first place. You don’t have to be a psychic to know how people are going to react to news that their private information is being acquired without their knowledge.

I guess I should have realized that there would be a “catch” for being able to use Dragon Dictation for free when desktop versions of the software cost from $50 to $900 depending on the version. Still, I would have preferred to be told that I can’t use the software without the capture of my contacts.

Mind you, acquiring my contacts was not a stipulation of being able to use their software. It feels like it was since that information was “stolen” from me.

Well, the lesson I learned here today is that I need to read the entire description of every application I download from the AppStore to make sure I’m not being screwed over or my privacy is being abused just so that I can use what I just acquired.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 197 other followers