Category Archives: Opinion

I was checking out Google’s updated iPhone interface…


Apple Maps App IconWith all the news organizations (I’m talking about you NBC), bloggers and tech pundits talking about how awful Apple’s new Maps App is, it’s amusing when I find problems with Google’s maps.

I did a search for local post offices and found the one that Apple’s Maps app didn’t find. So I asked Google to give me directions to the post office and here is what it produced for me:

The amusing part is that if you look close at the intersection of 141 and 100, you can see that there is a simple way to get to 100 without having to go further down 100 to the next intersection to turn around. The 141/100 intersection has been this way for well over 10 years now.

This just proves that MAPS ARE HARD! Google is just as susceptible of errors as Apple’s Maps app is.


Twitter CEO says curation tools for newsrooms are coming


Twitter CEO says curation tools for newsrooms are coming | Poynter..

So, maybe all the changes being made at Twitter are to create a way for news outlets like Reuters and the AP as well national news broadcasts and local news broadcasts too.

After all, when news happens, we usually hear about it first on Twitter.


Local 4G-LTE speeds


Att4glogoOne of the first things I did after activating my new iPhone 5 was to test the network speeds. I’ve heard a lot about how “true” 4G speeds are so fast that some locations are even faster than hardwire Internet speeds.

I used Speedtest.net’s iPhone app to test the speeds and saw pretty much the same speeds over WiFi as I was getting on my iPhone 4. That’s not surprising since I don’t have a fancy newer wireless router. For the iPhone 5 I got 9Mbps down and 4.5Mbps up and for the iPhone 4 I was getting 6Mbps down and 1.6Mbps up.

iPhone 4: 11Mbps down / 4.5Mbps up
iPhone 5: 9Mbps down / 4.5Mbps up

My surprise came with the 4G speeds:

iPhone 4: 6Mbps down / 1.6Mbps up
iPhone 5: 49.25Mbps down / 14.4Mbps up

I was astounded! My cable provider’s Internet speed is 32Mbps down / 4.2Mbps up!

It’s just amazing that my tiny little phone can get faster network speeds than my home.


Internet advertising and Ad-Blockers


Online adsI recently watched a great podcast on Internet advertising and ad-blockers and what ad-blockers were doing to sites like BoingBoing.

The show was This Week in Google on the TWiT network. They talked about how browser extension ad-blockers were ultimately hurting sides like BoingBoing. They used BoingBoing as the example.

To be fair, I see their point. I’m going to change the way my ad-blocker works and only block ads on sites where the ads are just intolerable. You know the kinds of ads I’m talking about. The ones the you feel like they are reaching out of your computer monitor and grabbing you buy the neck.

I will allow ads on sites that load quickly, look clean enough, no flashing obnoxious ads. Any site that takes longer than about 30 seconds to load will get ad-blocker turned on. I’m hoping that I’ll be able to disable ad-blocker on most of the sites I visit.

There are some sites that are just full of flashing nasty ads that make me sick. Sadly, The Joy of Tech is one of those sites. The Joy of Tech has so many ads that have things animating in them that I almost feel sea sick. On the other side of the fence is TWiT. TWiT’s ad images are nice static images that get the information across without looking like crap or making you dizzy. I’ve disabled ad-blocker on their site.

I’ll continue to do this so that sites that depend on advertising to help them stay up and running get the views they need. I want to promote positive advertising campaigns and not ads that make you want to pass-out. :)

One thing that was said on the show that amused me was that web pages have becomes many times bigger than their bitmapped equivalents. Meaning, take a screenshot of a web page and compare that image size to the amount of data downloaded when loading the page normally.

It’s true that web pages have become humungous messes because data speeds are so high these days and computers are so fast at rendering what they get, that most of the time it appears to be instantaneous. This is a trend that isn’t limited to web pages. Applications are also getting fat simply because developers don’t have to eek out every little cpu clock cycle like they did in the past.

A great quote from an article I read on the site Search Engine Land:

It takes about the same amount of computing to answer one Google Search query as all the computing done — in flight and on the ground — for the entire Apollo program!

We are not talking one computer or even an bank of computers, we are talking about every computer used by every Apollo launch. 18 Apollo missions. Just to perform one search query. Developers have become so lazy…

To be fair to developers. Why not. Computers are running so fast that my iPhone could probably do a single Apollo mission. The problem comes when developers move past older systems and don’t test on them anymore. Folks that are stuck with those systems wind up suffering or not even being able to use newer software that they may actually need.

I’ve strayed from my point here. Internet advertising needs to be something that you would put in front of your grand-mother for hours on end without repercussions or being removed from her last will and testament.


Be careful when checking App Store reviews


IOS 5 logo with Apple App Store LogoI felt the need to write this article after reading reviews for an app that is clearly an app designed to scam money out of patrons who are unfamiliar with Apple’s rules for writing iOS apps. (No link, I don’t want to feed the trolls as it were)

The app I am talking about is Fast Tools Pro. AppShopper.com also wrote an article warning people about this app, telling them that it doesn’t do what it advertises.

One thing I do that most people probably don’t is spend a little time with the reviews written by patrons of the app in the App Store. More importantly, I check the authors of 5 star reviews very carefully. Especially early after the release of the app.

ITunes SS001

Case in point: Fast Tools Pro. This app goes for $0.99 and is a Universal app meaning it is designed to work for both iPhone/iPod touch and iPad.

Looking at the number of stars the app has from it’s reviews along is very misleading. The App Store is showing it has 3 stars which makes it appear like an average app. Not great, but not awful either.

ITunes SS002

Expanding the star review shows it has twelve 5 star reviews and thirteen 1 star reviews. This early on, those 1 star reviews are very important. First though, I want to talk about the twelve 5 star reviews. I mean surely, if 12 people find the app worthy of 5 stars, it has to be pretty good. WRONG!

If you dig just a little bit into those 5 star reviews, you will find that they are by folks that are possibly paid to place those reviews.

ITunes SS003

Each review has some great words about the app, but take a closer look at each of the reviews other reviews. I’ll list several here (not necessarily from the screenshot):

  • ford47: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste, Autopilot Game, Space Blast+, What The Photo? Free, and Neon Glow FXs.
  • Cordie Mussel: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste, The Fleas, Kids Email, What The Photo? Free, and Marche.
  • David.Cohen: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste.
  • treed35: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste.
  • taylorMim: Fast Tools Pro, Marche.
  • Roman Churin: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste, Neon Glow FXs.
  • haddin: Fast Tools Pro, iBouquiniste, Neon Glow FXs.

All the above apps were given 5 stars in their reviews. Notice a pattern here?

There are companies out there that advertise that they will get you a top 10 spot in your category and even a top 10 spot in the overall list on the App Store. The above 5 star review look like they came from such a marketing strategy.

These reviews are most likely paid reviews and do not reflect the views of actual patrons.

What I do when looking at reviews in the App Store is to look at the “Most Critical” reviews. Now with “Free” apps, this is difficult because everybody and their brothers post reviews since it costs nothing to download the app and post the review.

However, when an app costs anything, even $0.99, reviews tend to be more realistic. At least the ones that were not paid for. Say you see a string of 1 star reviews. Checking other reviews these patrons have reviewed will show a variety of apps/products and a variety of star reviews. Not just 5 star reviews for just apps.

In the case of apps that are scamming apps like Fast Tools Pro is, you will find the 1 star reviews warn other possible patrons that the app being reviewed is either “false advertising” or “Warning” or even “Don’t waste your money”. It’s a safe bet that if there are a bunch of reviews like those, that the app is by a developer out to scam it’s possible patrons, not a legitimate app.

Just look at my previous post about an app called Microsoft Word 2012. When that app was still in the App Store (it was apparently removed by Apple not long after it was released), it was initially sold for $9.99 and reviews pretty much were all 1 star with text like “This is just a tips app!” and “You can’t even write text into a document!”. They later changed the description of the app in the store to give the impression that it was a hints/tips app. Still selling it for $9.99. They later changed the price to Free. Then the app disappeared from the store.

Apple has always said that it has a no refunds policy on App Store purchases. They do make exceptions, but basically the best advice to give a potential patron to the App Store is: “Buyer beware”. This really goes for both the iOS App Store and the Mac App Store, but the Mac App Store doesn’t have as many scammers as the iOS App Store.

Maybe due to the Mac App Store forcing the developers to use things like Sandboxing, this makes writing an app to try to trick someone into buying your app too much of a pain to develop.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 262 other followers